The Power of Anthropomorphism in Wildlife Narratives

The Power of Anthropomorphism in Wildlife Narratives


Anthropomorphism, the practice of attributing human traits to animals, has long been cautioned against scientists. They argue that it hinders our objective understanding of the natural world and how we should interact with it. However, recent evidence suggests that emotional attachments to wildlife, created through anthropomorphism, can actually be beneficial for conservation efforts.

Flaco, the escaped Eurasian eagle-owl from the Central Park Zoo, became a social media sensation, capturing the hearts of many. Some supporters even petitioned for his continued freedom. Ornithologists criticized this frenzy, citing the potential dangers to both the bird and the ecosystem. However, Flaco’s fame also increased interest in urban wildlife and sparked conversations about conservation.

Christine Wilkinson, a conservation scientist, acknowledges the shift in scientists’ mindset towards the importance of values and emotions. Historical examples, such as Native American stories and Disney films, demonstrate how stories and anthropomorphism have shaped our relationship with animals. Stories have a profound influence on our beliefs, actions, and policies, often surpassing scientific knowledge.

Social media has played a significant role in promoting wildlife narratives. Viral videos and celebrity endorsements, like actress Kristin Bell’s love for sloths, have raised awareness and generated funds for conservation. Research shows that media narratives influence public sentiments and attitudes towards animals, posing important questions about how we should interact with them.

Naming and building stories around study animals in scientific research have also led to successful conservation movements. P-22, a mountain lion in Los Angeles, gained a massive following, which contributed to funding for a wildlife crossing project. Anthropomorphism can foster a “sense of place,” where people feel connected to their local landscapes, leading to more environmentally friendly decisions and support for conservation initiatives.

However, anthropomorphized narratives can have negative consequences. Freya, a walrus, had to be euthanized due to people getting too close for selfies, and a habituated coyote named Carl in San Francisco was shot. The rapid spread of information on social media often oversimplifies or misleads, creating a disconnect between narrative and reality.

While there are risks involved, the benefits of anthropomorphism in wildlife narratives should not be dismissed. It is essential to have open conversations about when anthropomorphism is appropriate and when it may pose threats to both wildlife and people. By fostering emotional connections to wildlife, we can motivate individuals to care and support conservation efforts in the long run.

– Original Article: [Include source title and URL]
– Definitions:
– Anthropomorphism: The attribution of human characteristics, behaviors, or emotions to non-human entities.
– Conservation: The protection, preservation, and care of natural environments and wildlife.
– Ecosystem: A biological community of interacting organisms and their physical environment.
– Narrative: A story or account of events, experiences, or beliefs.
– Sense of place: The subjective emotional and intellectual connection someone has to a specific location or environment.